← All apps
🔬 Lab Findings 🔧 Stack Builder
B
Acceptable
Performance Optimized

Consentmo

by Consentmo · trust
Download size is within acceptable range. Monitor conversion impact on mobile storefronts.
What this means for your store

Consentmo is a well-performing app with a 'B' grade, meaning it's generally lightweight and won't significantly slow down your store. Its impact on how quickly your page responds is minimal on desktop, matching the average for trust apps, and it has virtually no background data usage after your page loads. While it uses a bit more processing power on mobile (around 66 milliseconds), this is still considered good for overall customer experience.

📦 Network B 89.09 KB
CPU A
17 ms desktop 66 ms mobile measured
📐 Layout A Stable (CLS 0)
View Consentmo on App Store → Grade B · Safe to install on any Shopify store

Consentmo — Performance Grade B

Acceptable — monitor on mobile

Consentmo is a trust badges and security signals app for Shopify that scores Grade B in StackConflict’s independent performance lab — placing it among the better-performing apps in the Trust category. With a moderate JavaScript bundle that is acceptable but worth monitoring as your stack grows (89.09 KB compressed) and negligible main-thread time — it will not compete with your theme or checkout scripts for CPU (17 ms desktop), it adds minimal friction to the storefront experience.

On mobile devices StackConflict’s 4× throttle pass measured just 66 ms (0.07s) — a direct measurement on a simulated mid-range Android device. This negligible overhead means Consentmo will not meaningfully affect your store’s Time-to-Interactive or Core Web Vitals scores. Merchants running multiple apps can safely stack Consentmo without it becoming the bottleneck in their combined performance budget.

Verdict (Grade B — Acceptable): Consentmo by Consentmo is a safe choice from a Shopify site speed perspective. It passes all StackConflict thresholds for payload, CPU, and layout stability. Install it with confidence on any storefront, including high-traffic mobile-first stores where JavaScript overhead directly influences Add-to-Cart conversion rates and Google’s Core Web Vitals ranking signals.

Lab Results

MetricValueGrade
JS Payload89.09 KBB
CPU Execution (desktop)17 msA
CPU Execution (mobile)66 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift0.0A
Overall GradeB
CategoryTrust
Last tested2026-05-31

Lab Verdict

Download size is within acceptable range. Monitor conversion impact on mobile storefronts.

Grading Scale

Each app is graded across three independent dimensions. The final grade is the worst of the three — no dimension can be hidden by a good score elsewhere.

GradePayloadCPU (desktop)CLSRisk
A≤ 30 KB≤ 50 ms< 0.1Lightweight — zero friction
B≤ 150 KB≤ 150 ms< 0.25Acceptable — monitor on mobile
C≤ 500 KB≤ 500 ms< 0.5Heavy — high conversion risk
D> 500 KB> 500 ms≥ 0.5Critical — avoid on mobile stores

About This Test

StackConflict measures app performance in a clean-room environment. Each app’s JavaScript bundle is injected into an owned Shopify development store via a Playwright-controlled browser, with no other third-party apps installed. V8 CPU cost is the ScriptDuration delta measured before and after injection on the same live page. Mobile CPU estimate applies the 4× Lighthouse slowdown factor to approximate real-device impact.

Data sourced from the StackConflict Lab. Last updated 2026-05-31.

Verification & Methodology
runs 3 independent clean-room runs · outliers stripped · median used
baseline control storefront scanned without injection → V8 ScriptDuration delta isolates app cost
lighthouse not cross-validated (Lighthouse CLI not run)
fingerprint 3b7c7c7816efdf79…
mobile CPU ✓ 66 ms — measured with 4× CDP throttle (mid-range Android)
raw trace HAR archive (public download coming Q3 2026)
tested 2026-05-31
Compare Consentmo with
vs AgeChecker.Net (Grade D) → vs DataGrail (Grade B) → vs hCaptcha (Grade C) → vs iubenda (Grade C) → vs McAfee SECURE (Grade A) → vs OneTrust Cookie Consent (Grade C) →